Higher Institutions' Centre of Excellence MALAYSIA: Driving Research in Islamic Financial Criminology & WINNERS OF GLOBAL ISLAMIC FINANCE AWARDS 2014,2015, 2016 & 2017; ACQ GLOBAL AWARDS 2015 & 2016 and ASEAN Risk Management Award 2016 & 2017; Global Good Governance Awards 2017
Saturday, March 23, 2013
IAFCC 2013
Friday, March 22, 2013
ARI Presentation TO CCM's Board
Today, the Accounting Research Institute (ARI) presented its proposal on "ARI-CCM Collaborative Works in Preparation of Forthcoming APG Mutual Evaluation" to the Board of Directors of Companies Commission of Malaysia (CCM). The Asia Pacific Group on Money Laundering (better known as APG) is an international organisation (regionally focused) consisting of 41 member-countries and a number of international and regional observers including the United Nations, IMF, FATF, Asian Development Bank, ASEAN Secretariat, Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat and the World Bank. The APG has a number of primary functions as follows:
(1) Assess APG members' compliance with the global Anti Money Laundering/Counter Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) standards through mutual evaluations; (2) Coordinate technical assistance and training with donor agencies and APG members/observers to improve compliance with AML/CFT standards; (2) Co-operate with international AML/CFT network; (4) Conduct research into money laundering and terrorism financing methods, trends, risk and vulnerabilities and (5) Contribute to the global AML/CFT policy development by active Associate Membership of FATF. Basically, the proposed ARI-CCM collaboration focuses on creating awareness on AML/CFT standard among Non-Profit Organisations in Malaysia. In the forthcoming APG Mutual Evaluation, one of the main focuses is to evaluate the governance and financing reporting of NPOs. The collaboration will include collaborative research, training and outreach programs. The BOD was indeed very supportive of the collaborative proposal.
(1) Assess APG members' compliance with the global Anti Money Laundering/Counter Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) standards through mutual evaluations; (2) Coordinate technical assistance and training with donor agencies and APG members/observers to improve compliance with AML/CFT standards; (2) Co-operate with international AML/CFT network; (4) Conduct research into money laundering and terrorism financing methods, trends, risk and vulnerabilities and (5) Contribute to the global AML/CFT policy development by active Associate Membership of FATF. Basically, the proposed ARI-CCM collaboration focuses on creating awareness on AML/CFT standard among Non-Profit Organisations in Malaysia. In the forthcoming APG Mutual Evaluation, one of the main focuses is to evaluate the governance and financing reporting of NPOs. The collaboration will include collaborative research, training and outreach programs. The BOD was indeed very supportive of the collaborative proposal.
Monday, March 18, 2013
IIDEX 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a86/82a867815f63c69d72b053bbc20e9592f7173d75" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f323/2f323f454e6811e475f28fa140c1b13d8e48920a" alt=""
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Income Generation and Cost Saving Lab
Day 3
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Income Generation and Cost Saving lab
Day 2:
On the second day of the workshop, participants were given more data and information by top management of the university. The Vice Chancellor, Dato' Sri Pro Ir Dr Sahol Hamid Abu Bakar gave his keynote address and vision. Income generation by public universities is a global trend. For Universiti Teknologi MARA, that extra income can be used for some very good projects, such as to finance the "Mengubah Destini Anak Bangsa - MDAB". The workshop focuses not only on income generation, more importantly it also promotes cost savings among members. In his speech, the VC highlighted the need to target a minimum cost saving of at least 30% by the year 2015. Cost saving measures include cost monitoring for university expenditures such as emolument (i.e allowances, overtime, claims and part-time salary); overhead & utilities (i.e. electricity, water, telephone, internet and wastages); process-related costs (i.e. printing, theft, beauracracy, waiting time) and resource-related cost (i.e. truance, absenteeism, fraud, idle time, low productivity).
Friday, March 15, 2013
Income Generation & Cost Saving Lab
Thursday, March 14, 2013
Visit from EKONIS-UKM
Thursday, March 7, 2013
Students Exchange Program
The Accounting Research Institute (ARI) and Faculty of Accountancy of Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) welcome four students from Rangsit University, Thailand who will be attending the Bachelor of Accountancy program at UiTM for one semester. This is part of a student exchange program between UiTM and Rangsit University. A memorandum of Understanding has been signed between the two universities in November 2012. Five UiTM students are already in Rangsit University to attend a six month course there. Today, Dr Kathy from Rangsit University accompanied the students for a short briefing with the Faculty of Accountancy, UiTM.
Monday, March 4, 2013
ARI Sharing Session at IIUM
Friday, March 1, 2013
FRGS 2013 Evaluation
The Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) represents one of the biggest research grants provided by the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) for all researchers in Malaysia. A total of 115 assessors who are professors in specific research areas have been appointed by by the Ministry to validate the final proposals submitted by institutions of higher learning. The final evaluation was held for four days in Port Dickson. The 2013 FRGS assessment had gone through very stringent evaluation process. At the institution level, each submission must undergo at least two levels of content evaluations. With respect technical processes, the Research Management Centres (RMC) of each institution will ensure researchers submit their proposals using the correct submission forms. Each respective department or responsibility centre is also expected to do a pre-submission workshop to explain the "do's" and "dont's" of proposal submissions. Once ready, the universities would invite MOHE-appointed assessors to validate the final approved proposals. If the assessors are not satisfied with the evaluation process, the whole stack of proposals from that university would be rejected. As such, only "Highly Recommended" approved proposals are submitted to MOHE for the final assessments. The evaluation process was very thorough. FRGS proposals are expected to highlight (i) "novelty" of the proposed project; (ii) Quality and intensity of collaborations; (iii) Technology transfer or commercialization potential; (iv) Quality of sectoral/national impacts; (v) Quality of organisational outcomes; (vi) Achievement viability of project objectives; (vii) Overall assessment of benefits.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)