"Trade Mispricing" is a common money laundering typology often used by merchandisers which aims to escape taxes of a home country through the formation of "subsidiaries" in other countries. Tax evasion is a predicate offence, and the use of such evaded taxes constitutes money laundering. Also known as transfer pricing manipulation or fraudulent transfer pricing, trade mispricing involves trade between related parties at prices meant to manipulate markets or to deceive tax authorities. Typically, as an illustration, Company ABC manufactures/assembles its product in three different subsidiaries - Subsidiary 1 in the home country; Subsidiary 2 in an offshore location and Subsidiary 3 in a "final market destination" country. Through related-party transactions, Subsidiary 1 sells its products to Subsidiary 2 (a tax haven) at a rediculously low price resulting in low profits being recognized by the company (hence much lower tax being paid to the home country). In its effort to maximise profit within a tax-free location of Subsidiary 2, it sells it products to Subsidiary 3 at a much inflated price. The end results being, the merchandisers "strategically" deflate profits to evade taxes in their home countries and to inflate profits in tax haven locations. It is nonetheless, a money laundering activity and should fall within the anti money laundering and counter financing of terrorism legislation. It has been reported that such money laundering typology is quite common and should be stopped at all costs. Merchandisers and manufacturers are potential players of transfer pricing manipulation. The introduction of the Goods Service Tax or GST would hopefully helps to reduce trade mispricing in the future. A recent initiative by the Transparency International is the establishment of the "Financial Transparency Coalition" where the parties (merchandisers) conducting a sale of goods or services in a cross-border transaction sign a statement in the commercial invoice certifying that no trade mispricing in an attempt to avoid duties or taxes has taken place and that the transaction is priced using the OECD arms-length principle. Higher Institutions' Centre of Excellence MALAYSIA: Driving Research in Islamic Financial Criminology & WINNERS OF GLOBAL ISLAMIC FINANCE AWARDS 2014,2015, 2016 & 2017; ACQ GLOBAL AWARDS 2015 & 2016 and ASEAN Risk Management Award 2016 & 2017; Global Good Governance Awards 2017
Sunday, March 30, 2014
Money Laundering Typology through Trade Mispricing
"Trade Mispricing" is a common money laundering typology often used by merchandisers which aims to escape taxes of a home country through the formation of "subsidiaries" in other countries. Tax evasion is a predicate offence, and the use of such evaded taxes constitutes money laundering. Also known as transfer pricing manipulation or fraudulent transfer pricing, trade mispricing involves trade between related parties at prices meant to manipulate markets or to deceive tax authorities. Typically, as an illustration, Company ABC manufactures/assembles its product in three different subsidiaries - Subsidiary 1 in the home country; Subsidiary 2 in an offshore location and Subsidiary 3 in a "final market destination" country. Through related-party transactions, Subsidiary 1 sells its products to Subsidiary 2 (a tax haven) at a rediculously low price resulting in low profits being recognized by the company (hence much lower tax being paid to the home country). In its effort to maximise profit within a tax-free location of Subsidiary 2, it sells it products to Subsidiary 3 at a much inflated price. The end results being, the merchandisers "strategically" deflate profits to evade taxes in their home countries and to inflate profits in tax haven locations. It is nonetheless, a money laundering activity and should fall within the anti money laundering and counter financing of terrorism legislation. It has been reported that such money laundering typology is quite common and should be stopped at all costs. Merchandisers and manufacturers are potential players of transfer pricing manipulation. The introduction of the Goods Service Tax or GST would hopefully helps to reduce trade mispricing in the future. A recent initiative by the Transparency International is the establishment of the "Financial Transparency Coalition" where the parties (merchandisers) conducting a sale of goods or services in a cross-border transaction sign a statement in the commercial invoice certifying that no trade mispricing in an attempt to avoid duties or taxes has taken place and that the transaction is priced using the OECD arms-length principle. Saturday, March 29, 2014
Money Laundering Typologies
Thursday, March 27, 2014
Exploring AMLATFA 2001
Monday, March 24, 2014
Islamic Financial Criminology - Research Outcome for 2014
Thursday, March 20, 2014
A Day at Brahim's Airline Catering
At an
effort to enhance corporate integrity at workplace, Brahim's Airline Catering
recently launched its corporate's Code of Ethics document.The company signed
the Corporate Integrity Pledge (CIP), an integrated initiative with PEMANDU,
the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and the Malaysian Institute of
Integrity (IIM). CIP is a
document that allows a company to make a commitment to uphold the
Anti-Corruption Principles for Corporations in Malaysia. By signing the
pledge, a company is making a unilateral declaration that it will not commit
corrupt acts, will work toward creating a business environment that is free
from corruption and will uphold the Anti-Corruption Principles for Corporations
in Malaysia in the conduct of its business and in its interactions with its
business partners and the Government. Three researchers from the Accounting
Research Institute (ARI) have been invited to share various research
instruments that have been developed at the Institute to measure corporate
integrity practices at workplaces. Prof
Normah explained the concepts of corporate integrity and how to effectively
used an instrument known as Corporate Integrity Assessment Questionnaire (CIAQ) for the company.
Associate Professors Dr Zuraidah and Dr Jamaliah developed case study
typologies for "gifts giving" and "ethical decisions".
Wednesday, March 12, 2014
ARI Sharing Session at Brahim's Airline Catering Integrity Week
Monday, March 10, 2014
Courtesy Visits to TH and Bank Islam
Thursday, March 6, 2014
Corporate Integrity 2014
The Accounting Research Institute (ARI) congratulates two corporations: Amanah Raya Berhad and Celcom Axiata for sharing their experiences after undergoing the Corporate Integrity System Malaysia (CISM) assessment in 2012. Interestingly, both companies have taken steps to improve their integrity initiatives at workplace. Premised on the earlier assessment results, Amanah Raya Berhad has increased its integrity infrastructure by appointing more "integrity ambassadors" whose main responsibility is to create integrity awareness. The company has also embarked on various research projects on integrity and ethics. Celcom on the other had has created the post of "Chief Integrity Officer" for the company. To improve integrity communication, Celcom has embarked on various online campaigns and video clippings on its intranet platform. The sharing session was made by both companies during a recent half day roundtable discussion with new/prospective assessors at the Malaysian Institute of Integrity (IIM) office in Jalan Duta, Kuala Lumpur.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)